Letter to the editor concerning Valstar et al., [Radiother Oncol 2020 Sep 23;S0167-8140(20)30809-4. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.034]

Letter to the Editor Wolf Subspecies: Reply to Weckworth et al. and Fredrickson et al

Colleagues disagree with statements in our discussion (Cronin et al. 2015) regarding subspecies taxonomy of wolves (Canis lupus) in southeast Alaska (Weckworth et al. 2015) and the southwest United States (Fredrickson et al. 2015). Following the presentation of results of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variation in several populations of wolves in North America, we discussed other genetic...

Letter to the Editor response: Nygaard et al.

The article by Nygaard and others (2016) proposes that applying batch correction approaches to microarray data from studies with unbalanced designs may inadvertently exaggerate the differences observed. In seeking to illustrate their point, Nygaard and others (2016) utilized a dataset (GSE61901) from a study we published (Towfic and others, 2014) and showed that one analysis pipeline utilizing ...

Letter to the Editor: Statements on the Contribution by Urbach et al. from Issue 4/2009

In the section BISE – Discussion you usually find discussions of several distinguished experts on important and topical issues of the field. In addition, the section offers the possibility to publish letters to the editor (e.g., on recently published contributions), thereby promoting the scientific discourse. The following is a statement by the colleagues Peter Mertens and Matthias Schumann on ...

Letter to the editor

Letter to the editor

 This article has no abstract.